Scripps VIVO scripps research logo

  • Index
  • Log in
  • Home
  • People
  • Organizations
  • Research
  • Events
Search form

Differential-effects of the cytoplasmic domains of cell-adhesion molecules on cell-aggregation and sorting-out

Academic Article
uri icon
  • Overview
  • Identity
  • Additional Document Info
  • View All
scroll to property group menus

Overview

authors

  • Jaffe, S. H.
  • Friedlander, D. R.
  • Matsuzaki, F.
  • Crossin, Kathryn
  • Cunningham, Bruce
  • Edelman, Gerald

publication date

  • May 1990

journal

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America  Journal

abstract

  • Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) are cell surface glycoproteins that play important roles in morphogenesis and histogenesis, particularly in defining discrete borders between cell populations. Previous studies have suggested that the cytoplasmic domains of CAMs play a significant role in their adhesion properties. These domains may also be involved in regulating other cellular interactions, such as those involved in the sorting-out of cells to form tissues. In the present studies, we have compared the effects of replacing the cytoplasmic domain of one CAM with that of another CAM of different homophilic binding specificity on cell adhesion and cell sorting-out. The molecules studied were liver CAM (L-CAM) and the neural CAM (N-CAM) sd polypeptide. One cDNA was constructed that encodes a chimeric molecule composed of the extracellular domain of L-CAM and the cytoplasmic plus transmembrane domains of the sd polypeptide of chicken N-CAM (called L/N-CAM). Another was constructed encoding a truncated L-CAM missing the last 50 residues of the cytoplasmic domain. Permanently transfected lines of mouse L cells were obtained expressing the truncated L-CAM ("L-L-50 cells") or the chimeric L/N-CAM ("L-L/N cells") and were compared with cells expressing intact L-CAM ("L-L cells"). Immunoblotting and ELISA analyses demonstrated that these various cell lines expressed similar amounts of CAMs at the cell surface. Aggregation of L-L and L-L/N cells occurred at similar rates in short-term aggregation assays and was inhibited by antibodies to the extracellular L-CAM binding domain. In contrast, L-L-50 cells did not aggregate. Incubation of transfected cells with cytochalasin D, which disrupts microfilaments, markedly inhibited aggregation of L-L cells but had no effect on L-L/N cell aggregation. Mixed L-L and L-L/N cells co-aggregated in short-term assays; in the longer-term sorting-out assays, however, they behaved differently: L-L cells sorted out from both L-L/N and untransfected cells, whereas L-L/N cells did not sort out from untransfected cells. These studies not only suggest that interactions of cytoplasmic domains of different CAMs with the cytoskeleton can modulate cell adhesion but also suggest that specific interactions with certain cytoskeletal components are required for events such as cell sorting and cell patterning.

subject areas

  • Animals
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal
  • Cell Aggregation
  • Cell Line
  • Cells, Cultured
  • Cytochalasin D
  • DNA
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Kinetics
  • L Cells (Cell Line)
  • Mice
  • Nocodazole
  • Plasmids
  • Restriction Mapping
  • Transfection
scroll to property group menus

Identity

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0027-8424

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3589

PubMed ID

  • 2185477
scroll to property group menus

Additional Document Info

start page

  • 3589

end page

  • 3593

volume

  • 87

issue

  • 9

©2021 The Scripps Research Institute | Terms of Use | Powered by VIVO

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Support